Talk:Pieta House

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the `image-needed` parameter once the image is added.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Whitewashing

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems as though wide scale whitewashing has occurred on this page. With controversies and sources removed. Quite disappointing and not not very transparent. ~2025-42999-38 (talk) 10:25, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI generated text (and other issues)

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Concerns have been raised about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:47, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

As noted by Gnomingstuff, there are significant issues with this title.

In addition to the AI-generated text issues (in which an LLM appears to have hallucinated a number of sources - or at the very least the LLM has not included refs correctly/fully), it looks for all the world as if:

someone created this title largely as a "container" for the findings of the 2018 HSE report. (In a way that isn't entirely in keeping with WP:COATRACK, WP:ATP or WP:CRIT - such that the entire article contained nothing but a "criticism" section.)
over time, and seemingly somewhat organically, the title was expanded to include some formation/history text. (Albeit relatively small compared to the "criticism" section.)
Over several edits and editors (mostly later reverted) much of the "criticism" text was just summarily removed. Largely without explanation. And replaced with more favourable text.
Then, relatively recently (and seemingly using AI-generated text), the criticism text was restored and expanded.

In all honesty, NONE OF THIS is good lads. WP:ATP and WP:NOTPROMO are two sides of the same coin. Editors with:

an issue with the subject org need to consider whether their edits are in keeping with WP:NOCRIT
a connection to the subject org need to consider whether their edits are in keeping with WP:COI and WP:NOTPROMO
an inclination to add LLM-generated text need to consider whether this use is consistent with WP:EPAI.

In general, articles are supposed to present factual content in a neutral and balanced manner. Not form a WP:BATTLEGROUND where argument and counter-argument are presented in an ever-escalating race to the bottom.

Unless there are other thoughts, I'm going to undertake an exercise to try and actually present this article NEUTRALLY. Not as a "battle" between "positions". Guliolopez (talk) 10:34, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Whitewashing

Possible AI generated text (and other issues)