Talk:Pallassena

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

India: Kerala / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of India (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Rationale/Discussion

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was split temple information to Meenkulathi Temple. Aervanath (talk) 04:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pallassena → Meenkulathi Temple - The bulk (over 90%) of the article is about the temple, not the city. - WQUlrich (talk) 21:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Pallassena West Village website contains a direct link to this article. They're probably going to be upset and undo the edit when they discover that it doesn't read like a travel brochure anymore! (Sorry, guys) WQUlrich (talk) 21:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Maybe a split instead of a move? The place would still warrant an article, wouldn't it? Dekimasuよ! 02:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Definitely, but you would have to start from scratch, because there isn't much to go on. 208.222.13.22 (talk) 02:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

A page that knows where it met you.

Rationale/Discussion