Talk:Ovonramwen/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vanderwaalforces (talk · contribs) 17:45, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: A.Cython (talk · contribs) 20:17, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I will review this one as part of GARC#113. A.Cython(talk) 20:17, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

When I accepted to review I did not notice that the article was long. While from a superficial read things look well organized and sourced, I have not tried to go through the whole text in detail. It needs some trimming before even there is a proper review; content and source review will take place after the trimming. See my comments in detail below. Thank you. A.Cython(talk) 22:10, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Various

• No edit wars
• Neutral
• Broad and focused (though it needs a better summary)
• No copyright issues, Earwig's Copyvio Detector gives 8.3% flagging names
• Figures have appropriate justifications and captions

Prose & MoS

• Lead is long with 513 words. Per MOS:LEADLENGTH the lead should be Most well-written leads will be longer than about 100 words, with most featured articles containing about 250 to 400 words. Any trimming in this direction is appreciated; I will consider it ok around the range of 440–450 words.
• Article size is 10162 words of prose going against summary style, note that WP:TOOBIG: > 9,000 words Probably should be divided or trimmed, though the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material. Given that editors at GA take this more seriously than other years (for my second GA, the reviewer required me to trim a 15,000 article myself to 7,500 words). Please bring it down to 8,000-ish words.