Talk:Otto prints
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Johnbod
 | A fact from Otto prints appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
- 8,449 views, even without the pic! Sex and violence pays off again. Johnbod (talk) 15:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 16:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
( )
The Chastisement of Cupid
- ... that three of the 16th-century Florentine Otto prints show young males tied to a tree and abused by women? Source: Randolph, Adrian W. B., Engaging Symbols: gender, politics, and public art in fifteenth-century Florence, 2002, Yale University Press, ISBN 9780300092127, google books for the two "Cupid" ones, and British Museum 1852,0424.7 "The Cruelty of Love; a woman showing the heart just plucked from the chest of a young man who is bound to a tree".
Moved to mainspace by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 04:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Otto prints; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
This article is new enough and long enough. The image is suitably licensed, the hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
