Talk:Otrovert

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 December 2025 by reviewer Somepinkdude (talk · contribs).

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

The classic "task-focus" of temperament theory?

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Otroversion sounds like the old "people vs task focus" dimension of classic temperament theory. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-factor_models_of_personality). Otroversion would be the "task" end of it. (Its opposite, "people-focus", could then be called something like "homiversion"). That is a factor that really does need to be recognized more, and this would give it a handy simple name.Eric B (talk) 17:05, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

The classic "task-focus" of temperament theory?