Talk:Netlify

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Netlify article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing: Websites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Mid-importance).

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor on 21 April 2021.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Netlify logo.svg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Comment: The Netlify-related files that were unilaterally and erroneously reported as cross-wiki spam have been reinstated by a Commons admin at my request. Edelsheim (talk) 11:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Should Jamstack get its own article?

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Tonight I was suggesting to someone that if they wanted to get started with building a website with JavaScript, they should check out the "Jamstack" way of developing sites. I naturally looked here in Wikipedia and was surprised to find only a redirect to the Netlify page with just a paragraph about "Jamstack". While developers at Netlify came up with the term "Jamstack" and started using it, the term is now widely used within the web development world. jamstack.org lists the many site generators and headless CMS's that support "jamstack" development. There are numerous articles in reliable sources, and multiple books now available. It feels to me like there should be a separate article specifically about Jamstack. Thoughts? Opinions? - Dyork (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, it shouldn't get its own article because it is purely a Netlify marketing term.

There is a website called "jamstack.org", but despite its top-level domain being ".org", it appears to be a Netlify website. I get the impression (which could of course be wrong) that some deception is intended here, insofar as ".org" normally suggests a non-commercial site and jamstack.org appears to be a Netlify marketing site. Longitude2 (talk) 07:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deleting material with non-reliable source

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The section "Reception" quotes from a Netlify press release. A press release does not qualify as a reliable source. I'm going to delete the quote. Longitude2 (talk) 10:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

Should Jamstack get its own article?

Deleting material with non-reliable source