Talk:National Judicial Reference System
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 February 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... this is a Income-tax Department, Government of India project. --Saakaryadav (talk) 03:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (this project belongs to the Income-tax Department, Government of India) --Saakaryadav (talk) 03:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... (it is a project of the Ministry of Finance, Income-tax Department, Government of India) --Saakaryadav (talk) 04:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
First two sentences
[edit][1] I know I made a mess trying to use chatGPT to restructure and improve the article, and I appreciate the revert. Indeed, I had some problems logging in which prevented me from reverting myself.
However, I did a true copyedit of the first two sentences and added some links that really ought to be accepted. -- Arjayay what do you think? Marmel2 (talk) 14:45, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Marmel2, I have partially reinstated your edit. We don't link major countries (which most people would agree India is) as WP:OVERLINKING and whilst the idea of linking direct taxes was good, the link itself needed simplifying, as MOS:PIPESTYLE. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Arjayay Thanks for explaining what you did and some of the rules. It's been a long time since I actively edited on Wikipedia and I'm getting back up to speed reading manuals and guides. But this takes time. And yes, India is a major country. :) Marmel2 (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2025 (UTC)