Talk:NFL Academy
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Dclemens1971 in topic Did you know nomination
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected, closed by Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:15, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the NFL Academy received 3500 applications for only 30 places?
- Source: "There were 3,500 applicants this year for 30 places." The Athletic
- Reviewed:
Moved to mainspace by Danski454 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Danski454 (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2026 (UTC).
- @Danski454: Its a good length, its new and it might be about one of a few interesting subjects mentioned. I have to guess at what "NFL" might mean. The refs look OK and its long enough. The hook is not interesting. "Some academy that you've never heard of had a lot of applications" and the evidence is behind this paywall... somewhere. Your "newbie" badge gets you through though. I can suggest some themes e.g. DYK that the American National Football Academy is based in a town in the UK and a city in Australia? (from the lede). ... after writing that suggestion though .... I read down further ... where it talks about Asia? What is this article about? The Title, contradicts the lede I think, and that seems to contradict the sub-headings. Ping me when the subject is more clear, at the moment its not a contender. Victuallers (talk) 11:55, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Danski454:
Hey, welcome to DYK! Victuallers has raised a few issues in their review, so, those'll have to be addressed before this nomination can go forward. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:19, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
The nominator has not responded here or edited the article, despite two pings and the above review. Given that they have been active elsewhere but have not addressed the concerns, this is marked for closure as abandoned. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:36, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Danski454: