Talk:Monocoupe 90
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 18 years ago by LanceBarber in topic Move?
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Move?
[edit]I believe this should be renamed to something else. I don't know what. Perhaps it can wait until there are more Monocoupe aircraft on the servers. --Colputt 01:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Could rename it to just Monocoupe... since the variants are numberous. I just added another variant with ref. Vote "FOR" Monocoupe. Should check "What links here" on the article: 5 other redirects to Monocoupe 90, and 32+ links to the article. Clean up of the other redirects would be highly desirable to do as well. Don't wnat to leave a convoluted mess. LanceBarber 07:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles




