Talk:Mon oncle Antoine
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 December 2004. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Deletion notice
[edit]This article was listed on votes for deletion; see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mon oncle Antoine. Peter O. (Talk, automation script) 20:05, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
Oscar notice
[edit]Mon oncle Antoine did not actually win an Oscar for Best Foreign Language film. 74.118.192.156 17:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mon oncle Antoine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140403094201/http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1971 to http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1971
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mon oncle Antoine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930013551/http://avtrust.ca/masterworks/2000/en_film.htm to http://avtrust.ca/masterworks/2000/en_film.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706170226/http://www.broadcasting-history.ca/programming/television/programming_popup.php?id=1170 to http://www.broadcasting-history.ca/programming/television/programming_popup.php?id=1170
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Movie is spoiled here for all future viewers.
[edit]Why have so many Wikipedia articles been written in a way that spoils them for all future viewers by telling all of the details? It is entirely possible to write the plot section of an article for any movie without giving away the entire ending. This constitutes laziness on the part of the writer, and should not be condoned.
Somebody please fix this! I would do it if I had the skills at editting articles, but I am only learning how, so I am not confident I can do it without messing it up.
And all people who edit or write articles on movies, please take note that telling the ending is never acceptable. It is absolutely forbidden in all movie reviews of any kind, on tv, in videos, in magazines and newspapers. People who do it in the comments to movies on YouTube get a lot of very hard blowback from other viewers, because it wrecks the entire experience of watching a movie! So please put in the effort to think of a way of describing the movie's plot without just listing by rote every occurence. Especially not the ending. The mystery of the story MUST be preserved!
People who are too lazy to bother doing that should not be writing articles on movies at all. 174.3.216.108 (talk) 18:34, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. If you don't want the movie spoiled then don't read the plot section. Easiest thing in the world. Jon698 (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2025 (UTC)