Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a453bf2a3cdcf25b

Jump to content

Talk:Modern Arabic mathematical notation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Attentive17 in topic Mistake in Complex Analysis example

Untitled

[edit]

hello, I was trying to add some to an article called Modern Arabic mathematical notation and I can add to them .. but I just need to a special font that it is not aailable , or I need to upload pictures and make use them to the article.. any help please thank you in advance --M. Abuhelwa (talk) 11:27, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Persian

[edit]

Reading the article, it is somewhat implied that mathematical symbols and notation is translated in Persian speaking countries as well as Arabic speaking world. I cannot speak for Afghanistan, but for Iran I know that this is not the case. Any numeric value, and mathematical notation is written in English and from left-to-right; all the standard western notation is used in all grades of primary and secondary education as well as higher. The only difference is the use of Perso-Arabic (Indian) digits. Therefore, I shall attempt to remove any references to this and correct mistakes, perhaps even add a section to rectify this if this discussion entry won't be disputed in the next two weeks. Bee (talk) 23:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Specific Countries

[edit]

Regarding the above comment on Persian, the article should note which specific countries use this system. In all Arabic speaking countries? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 오블라디 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mistake in Complex Analysis example

[edit]

In the text version of the example formula for complex analysis:

ع = س + ت ص = ل(حتا ى + ت حا ى) = ل ھت‌ى = ل∠o

The "∠o" part is shown at the end, while it should be at the start. Probably due to a justification error. I'm not sure how to fix this, but maybe someone else can fix it. Attentive17 (talk) 09:40, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply