Talk:Michigan relics
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Hippypink in topic Heavy bias
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michigan relics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy bias
[edit]This article is an embarrassment to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.96.106.213 (talk) 17:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Biased toward WP:RSs and against representing obvious fakes as possible real artifacts? I'll take that embarrassment any day. Heiro 04:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Copernicus was not an astronomer by trade, just a polymath that worked for the church and keen on making quality observations in his spare time. Clearly he would have been rejected by wikipedia, but the church took care of him first for his outrageous, non-mainstream claims. SCS (talk) 05:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Archaeology articles
- Unknown-importance Archaeology articles
- Start-Class Michigan articles
- Low-importance Michigan articles
- WikiProject Michigan articles
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- Start-Class Latter Day Saint movement articles
- Low-importance Latter Day Saint movement articles
- WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement articles