This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Miami was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Text or other creative content from this version of Miami was copied or moved into Music of Miami with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The following sentence is formatted incorrectly:
"Globally, it is one of the most at-risk cities, according to a 2020 report by Resources for the Future. Global sea level rise."
should probably be changed to something like:
"Globally, it is one of the most at-risk cities due to global sea level rise, according to a 2020 report by Resources for the Future." Aftramarket (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Done The content and citations were duplicated there. I removed the duplicates, and rewrote the remaining content. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Donald Albury21:17, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 hours ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hi there User:glman...this flag-in-the-infobox of city articles battle has been going on too long. I'm wondering if a RfC would be beneficial? Previous discussions don't seem to have led to a consensus. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I honestly don't have a strong personal opinion, but I think it could be worth seeing if there's consensus to change from the current wording in the MOS. Certainly will attract more outside voices into the discussion. glman (talk) 15:12, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I think a lot of use of flags in infoboxes is decorative rather than informative (esp. examples such as a state flag in a city infobox...those tiny icons are not readily identifiable by most readers...I wouldn't even recognize my own state's flag in that tiny icon), but I've read through the archives of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons and there are a number of editors who seem to prefer them (and, I suspect, think there should be more permitted). I recently reverted an addition of state/country flag icons to a city infobox, relying on the part of MOS:INFOBOXFLAG that says Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they could be unnecessarily distracting and might give undue prominence to one field among many. But then I read through further, to where it qualifies it with Human geographic articles – for example, settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes. So I undid my revert, because the MOS makes it an explicit option and I didn't want to argue over it when informative vs. decorative is so subjective.I think an RfC would be heavily attended and contentious, and would probably result in a stalemate between those who think flags add value and those who don't. Schazjmd(talk)21:54, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done The content and citations were duplicated there. I removed the duplicates, and rewrote the remaining content. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Donald Albury 21:17, 15 April 2026 (UTC)