This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article per 15.04.2017 states that a proper scientific notion of the concept 'material' excludes the possibility of a material of anything to be itself living. This is a notion that is not scientific, merely a result of a conventional cognition; such habitual ways of thinking are to my understanding pretty exactly what is defined as un-scientific. It might be that one naturally think of the genome, for instant, one organisms genetically inherited material, in total, as a non-living material, because our anchestors are dead perhaps; but quite the contrary, this prime example of the material, is very much alive, and a definitive property of anything living. I will therefor attempt to edit, correct the fallacy. --Xactnorge (talk) 14:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
