This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The final sentence of the mash tun section currently reads:
Using a lauter tun limits the breweries to single-step infusion mashing, however, because such a vessel is not completely appropriate for the lautering process[cite?].
I'm guessing "lautering process" was written instead of "mashing process" by mistake. Even with that change though, it seems like an odd claim to make, especially given the rising popularity of all-in-one brewing systems at the homebrew level. What would prevent a small scale commercial brewery from using a single vessel for a multi-step mash and lautering? 193.61.207.188 (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
