Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2796f9bed5521ca

Jump to content

Talk:Macon Peaches

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by SirParzifal in topic Splitting up article?
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Macon Peaches. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Splitting up article?

[edit]

This appears to be an article which lumps about ten different unrelated Macon baseball franchises together. While this is probably helpful for earlier, less notable franchises, there are definitely some that should probably have their own articles - like the 1991-2002 Macon Braves. It also makes the infobox a nightmare to look at. Is there any reason these are lumped together as they are now? If not, I'm going to go ahead and start creating individual articles for some of these teams. SirParzifal (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply