Talk:M104 Wolverine

start

Please consider this first entry a working rough draft. This is my first whole Wiki article, and I have attempted to gather the best information from multiple sources in order to make this article as accurate and concise as possible. However this is, after all, an important but relatively obscure vehicle and your information may be better than mine. --Cavgunner 09:50, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Good start I'm going to see if I can find a pic for it. Ultratone85 11:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

is the only two easily accessible (free) ones I could find, but they're not desperately good. Hmm. Shimgray | talk | 14:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't know which one is the plagiarist, but [www.answers.com/topic/m104-wolverine] is word-for-word identical in some sections (it has a couple paragraphs added). GettoPhilosopher 22:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Answers.com reuses Wikipedia material - it credits us somewhere on that page (at the bottom?) Shimgray | talk | 23:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

nomenclature

anyone know where the army pulled this number out of their rear from? since theres already a M104 trailer. whats an M103 avlb? does the number refer to the bridge itself? or what?

M numbers are often repeated for various pieces of equipment and vehicles, however all are tracked and inventoried in the US by their unique G numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.43.191.1 (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

So no, there is no logic behind the number systems.ItsRainingCatsAndDogsAndMen (talk) 23:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Marines abandoned this?

The Marines aren't using their own bridge units anymore. This is a few years old, at least.ItsRainingCatsAndDogsAndMen (talk) 23:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)