Talk:Lymphoma

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 November 2019 and 21 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Marmasphan.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Contradiction in article

Currently, the lede says that 10% of all lymphoma are Hodgkins Lymphoma, but under Classification it says that 15% are. Somebody who knows far more than I do needs to correct whichever one of these is wrong. JDZeff (talk) 07:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Info missing

The entire range of BTK inhibitors that suppress CLL and SLL go unmentioned. There is massive information at NIH Pubmed regarding these meds. They have radically changed treatment of B-Cell lymphomas for many victims. This article needs a substantial revision by an oncologist or other source matter expert. ~2026-35170-81 (talk) 21:33, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

WHO classification section

Elements that can selectively display or hide content can interfere with the ability of readers to access said content. Screen readers can not read content this is hidden. Moreover, content in an article should never be collapsed by default. This applies equally to content in tables and embedded lists per MOS:COLLAPSE. If the information is important and the concern is article density or length, consider dividing the article into more sections, integrating unnecessarily list-formatted information into the article prose, or splitting the article per MOS:DONTHIDE. Isaidnoway (talk) 10:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

In-line citations

The article has more than enough references at the bottom of the page, but the in-line citations are lacking throughout the article. Later sections, like those in "Treatment" and parts of "Diagnosis" have one or two footnotes per paragraph, while there are over 84 sources in the reference section. There are also many weasel words, like "have been considered" and "many other forms," but these should be a simpler fix that I can get done. I will also start on including more specific citations throughout the article as I work through each section, I just wanted to explain why the header at the top of the article was included. Nontes (talk) 04:17, 27 June 2026 (UTC)