Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a270f31f2fb71dfc

Jump to content

Talk:Lipid bilayer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Good articleLipid bilayer has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 6, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 6, 2024Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article


nonpolar attraction?

[edit]

This is the first sentence of the second paragraph of the "Mechanics" section:

"As discussed in the Structure and organization section, the hydrophobic attraction of lipid tails in water is the primary force holding lipid bilayers together."

I am not qualified to edit this, but I have spent the day studying the hydrophobic effect and my understanding is that there are no attractive forces driving it. Could someone more knowledgeable fix this if it's wrong? 100.14.196.129 (talk) 22:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Van der Waals attraction. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to several uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Is anyone interested in addressing this concern? Z1720 (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

This article has many uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 22:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Keep: A well-written article. I've tidied it up and added sources. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.