Talk:Liberal institutionalism
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| The content of Neoliberalism (international relations) was merged into Liberal institutionalism on 30 December 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| On 8 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Institutional liberalism to Liberal institutionalism. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 8 August 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 10:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Institutional liberalism → Liberal institutionalism – "Liberal institutionalism" is the more common term. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- — Advertised at WikiProject International relations. 18:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
One of three most important IR traditions today
[edit]Today, the majority of US IR scholars are social constructionists. The source used for [1] is from 1994 and far too old to say current. - Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2023). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations (9th ed.). Oxford University Press. FrenziedStargrime (talk) 21:36, 10 December 2025 (UTC)