Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a5f98dca76fad4

Jump to content

Talk:Leopard shark/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

OK, I will begin a review and make straightforward copyediting changes as I go. Please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

An active-swimming predator, groups of leopard sharks often follow... - a singular subject, then plural - looks odd --> need to make them the same. You can be creative.
Changed. -- Yzx (talk) 04:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
between sharks in different parts of its range. - ditto
Changed. -- Yzx (talk) 04:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
There are some other examples of singular and plural in the one sentence. Generally using singular looks best as a default option unless one is talking about a group of critters.
Could you be more specific? Which ones? -- Yzx (talk) 04:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'll find some. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
In the northern parts of its range, females use bays and sloughs as nursery areas, while to the south they give birth in more open areas - (s/p/p)
Changed. -- Yzx (talk) 21:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Leopard sharks are wary of humans and pose almost no danger. - This sentence has bugged me, but I can't for the life of me think of a smoother way to say it.

Overall, pretty good and nearly there. Have a go at singularising some of the sharks and I'll be back later to help out. Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:47, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Leopard sharks are wary of humans and pose almost no danger. - there are two problems:
  1. There is an expected indirect object, as in "... pose danger to something" (in this case, 'to humans', but the repetition reads even worse than the missing object).
  2. The second half of the sentence is a consequence of the first, but the bare conjunction "and" doesn't convey the causality.
The best I can suggest for the sentence is: Leopard sharks are wary of humans and so pose almost no danger. Sorry, that's not much help. --RexxS (talk) 16:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps: Wary and quick to flee, leopard sharks pose almost no danger to humans.? -- Yzx (talk)