Talk:Krymchaks
Add topicLatest comment: 20 years ago by Kilo-Lima in topic Good Article nomination has failed
 | Krymchaks was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Good Article Nomination
[edit]This is generally an excellent article but the lack of in-line references and only one listed source gives me some concern. If more references cannot be found, it will likely end up at WP:UGA. Good work overall, though. Eluchil404 23:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Good Article nomination has failed
[edit]The Good article nomination for Krymchaks has failed, for the following reason:
- Lack of citations and only one source. More, and it should pass. Iolakana|T 18:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)