Talk:Ken Bone (activist)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ken Bone (activist)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Of the universe (talk · contribs) 00:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

I am planning to review this article. Of the universe (talk) 00:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

The article is well written. It's short and sweet--- an appropriate length for the subject.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   Looks great! It will pass pending one change: The only problem is in the lead, the article refers to Bone as an activist. There is no citation in the body of the article to support the characterization of him as an activist. The text needs a citation for "activist," or else the lead and short description need a small change to remove the word "activist."

Changes made!

1. C. It contains no original research:

   Passed spot check!

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

   Passed spot check!

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

   Short and sweet! It is the appropriate length for the subject.

3. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

4. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

5. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   Looks good

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

6. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   pass!

Of the universe Thank you so much for the review, and for your patience. I have made the requested changes in the article - please let me know if there's anything else I should do. Best, ~Liance^talk 23:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@Of the universe, are you prepared to pass this article? -- asilvering (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes! Thank you for pinging me. —Of the universe (say hello) 01:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 25 April 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is against this being enough of a WP:PT1 situation. As editors have pointed out, the current disambiguation may be subpar, and a move back to Ken Bone (activist) may be an option there, if editors wish to move forward with that (that could potentially be filed as an uncontroversial technical move). (non-admin closure) ⹃Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley$\lor$investigateᛅ} 21:34, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

---

Ken Bone (personality) → Ken Bone – There is only one other notable Ken Bone, Ken Bone (basketball), and this Bone is overall more known. He is also iconic for his surname in addition to the event, so it is fitting for his article to just be Ken Bone. Google Search: TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 21:28, 25 April 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

• Comment The longstanding stable title was Ken Bone (activist) until an undiscussed move in 2024. 162 etc. (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Support per WP:PT1. 162 etc. (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Weak oppose (not much evidence provided that this Bone is actually the primary topic) - but also, a Comment: ..."He is also iconic for his surname in addition to the event, so it is fitting for his article to just be Ken Bone" isn't really a reason to move him to the basename. Just because someone's claim-to-fame IS their name doesn't mean they 'deserve' to be located at the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 08:33, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

  I agree that the nomination could have been presented better, and OP should have provided pageviews stats. The proposed primary topic currently gets over 90% of the clicks, hence my PT1 argument above. 162 etc. (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose for lack of enduring importance. BD2412 T 00:40, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose but rename. Absolutely terrible disambiguator. Anyone is a "personality". No primary topic per long-term significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:11, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose, not convinced there's a PRIMARYTOPIC.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.