Talk:Keel effect

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 August 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) on 22 August 2017 with the comment:
Dicdef, untouched since 2009
It was contested by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) on 28 August 2017 with the comment:
more than dictionary definition; has incoming links

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Projects

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have tagged this inactive page with two projects, hoping that they will help to improve it. – Fayenatic London 13:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please delete this page

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page is an embarrassment and ought to be deleted. A "keel" or "pendulum" effect is a fallacy and does not exist. Aircraft rotate around their center of gravity (conservation of momentum) so there is no gravitational pull that could upright them. It's that easy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aviation Pete (talk • contribs) 13:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Projects

Please delete this page