This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It's easy to say that Employment Security "found him to be eligible for benefits" and that there were "never any allegations of unsavory dealings behind the awarding of benefits", but that begs the question. Zarelli was found to have gotten benefits by misrepresentation, a simple legal conclusion based on the fact that he received his legislative salary at the same time he was receiving Unemployment Insurance benefits. As everyone who has ever been on Unemployment Insurance knows, on each weekly claim form you are asked a very easy question, "Did You Work?"
Zarelli answered "No" to this question each week. We are then faced with an unavoidable dilemma: Is doing the "people's work" in the state legislature really considered "work"?
Zarelli, by his own certification on a legal federal document, answers "No". So why are the citizens/taxpayers of the State of Washington continuing to pay him a salary if he is NOT doing the "people's work"?
Admittedly this is snarky, but it's a question that has gone unanswered -- in fact, it has gone unasked. It's beyond me why "[t]he controversy soon passed"...
By the way, "misrepresentation" is also known as "fraud"... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farnsworth1968 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
