Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27f3013df51ecfa

Jump to content

Talk:Jay Som

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by TarnishedPath in topic Did you know nomination
Good articleJay Som has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 16, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 10, 2026.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jay Som created 1 Billion Dogs?

Discography charts

[edit]

Everybody Works charted for a week on US Independent Albums and Heatseekers Albums charts at positions 46 and 17, respectively. --Aleccat 12:29, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Done. --Aleccat 17:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Jay Som/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    I spot checked all the citations that appeared in the article. Most of the content in the article represents what was said in those articles, including not having copyright violations and plagiarism. Though, I do have some notes as seen below  Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragonhawk12 (talkcontribs) 22:45, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:

* The sentence "Everybody Works landed on Best of 2017 lists from Pitchfork, NPR, Stereogum, Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly and Billboard." does need a citation

  • The phrase "In June 2018, Duterte opened for The National at their show in Dublin, Ireland. She also toured with Paramore that same year, and was their opening act for the second half of Tour 5." doesn't seem to be backed up by a source (I have/will mark it with a "Citation needed" tag).
  • Please see WP:VERIFYOR and WP:OR

Everything is fixed

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  1. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  2. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  3. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  4. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  5. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I will give some time for the nominator to fix these issues. If the nominator doesn't respond in a reasonable amount of time (2ish weeks) I will fail the article. If you have any questions please feel free to ask! (This is the whole purpose of a review, after all!) (This is also my first GA review, so if I get something wrong or make a mistake please point it out to me)

Everything is in order now. Congrats on the new GA article!!! Dragonhawk12 (talk) 22:10, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

  1. Alright Veyhola (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Oh wow I only have to fix one thing Veyhola (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Alright I fixed 2C Veyhola (talk) 22:57, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    The 12th source doesn't seem like it mentions the tour from "The National". I might be wrong though. Are you able to point to where they are mentioned in the article? If they aren't, please add a source about The National's tour. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) 20:19, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Oh that was for Paramore, but I'll add another one Veyhola (talk) 01:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Ok, it's done now Veyhola (talk) 01:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I still don't see the part in that source where they mention "The National". Could you point out where it was said? Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) 04:10, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I added another source for that. Is it sufficient? Veyhola (talk) 10:56, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I saw the new source you added after “Dublin, Ireland” but I don’t see where in that source where it mentions the national’s tour Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 14:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Oh whoops wrong one Veyhola (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I'll just remove the "The National" part entirely. Veyhola (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Well, everything looks good now. Congrats on the new Good Article!!! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 19:50, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you Veyhola (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nominator: EternalBaile (talk · contribs) 05:25, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Dragonhawk12 (talk · contribs) 22:10, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TarnishedPath (talk) 13:05, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Veyhola (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 02:25, 17 April 2026 (UTC).Reply