This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Apart from one passing reference in the background section, this article exclusively refers to the US. Is Infotainment an exclusively US phenomenon? No. If this article was titled 'Infotainment in the US' it wouldn't need any changing. A broader point: there are many articles in Wikipedia that do this - ignore anything outside the US, reflecting an insular, narrow viewpoint that is simply offensive to those outside. There are over a billion English speakers globally, less than a third of them in the US. Could Wikipedia writers and editors please try to reflect on that. Oscar2591 (talk) 10:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
