This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
For example the first paragraph mentions fuel taxes against local pollution but surely if you are against local pollution you are going to impose Low-emission zones in urban areas rather than a fuel tax which also covers rural areas.
Also later about fossil fuel subsidies it says ‘The removal of these subsidies through reform are a positive implicit carbon price.’ but that does not make sense to me as surely removal of the subsidies results in a higher carbon price but it could still be zero not positive.
I don't understand why the short description is 'Indirect costs of climate change measures'.
