Talk:Hybrid iguana

Ecuador Mid‑importance

	Ecuador portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Galápagos Islands task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of molecular biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Amphibians and Reptiles Mid‑importance

	Hybrid iguana is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an a range map be included in this article to improve its quality.

Genetic success?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Currently the article says that, "The Hybrid Iguana can be considered a genetic success" and then goes on to say, "the offspring are viable, although likely sterile." Aren't these two statements contradictory? — Epastore (talk) 16:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reference issue

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Will someone please correct the error with the reference? Otr500 (talk) 05:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I did, to some extent. No more red text visible on the page, though some information is effectively sequestered to the markup. Unfortunately, the recent update to {{citation}} has created many such errors. --BDD (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Genetic success?

Reference issue