Talk:Hyacinth Graf Strachwitz

Hyacinth Graf Strachwitz has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 18, 2014	Peer review	Reviewed
December 17, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
March 30, 2014	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
December 22, 2016	Good article reassessment	Kept
February 26, 2026	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Mid-importance).

Germany: Prussia Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Prussia portal This article is supported by the Prussia task force.

Military history: Biography / European / German / World War I / World War II A‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

A

This article has been rated as A-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Silesia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Silesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Silesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SilesiaWikipedia:WikiProject SilesiaTemplate:WikiProject SilesiaSilesia

Archives

Archive 1

GA Reassessment

Latest comment: 5 months ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Hyacinth Graf Strachwitz

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Restored to A-class version. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:10, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 04:05, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I recommend restoring the article to its A-class state which is fully referenced and cited. Since then, a number of editors have "edited" the article, in some instances removing large sections, including the citations. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:50, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

(GAR stalker) That seems very sensible, so I've done that. Clearly a fully-cited and carefully-reviewed version is better than one that has been chopped about, leaving many uncited paragraphs. The A-class version is quite a lot longer than what was there until today. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A page that knows where it met you.

GA Reassessment

Hyacinth Graf Strachwitz