Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a59c5c5dc2aea1

Jump to content

Talk:Human rights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 days ago by ~2026-40148-63 in topic Definition is wrong
Former featured article candidateHuman rights is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 9, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 14, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article candidate

More information on criticism of individual focus

[edit]

The criticism part, as well as the general description, chiefly note the criticism of applicability to cultural contexts. Another, arguably even more relevant criticism in recent years has been that human rights focus on an individual level and are inadequate to respond to problems affecting groups, as well as those affecting lived environments. This criticism is related to the advocacy of community rights. This is however not the same as human rights not fitting into communitarian cultural contexts. The article could also expand on the selective application of human rights. ~2026-32016-62 (talk) 11:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is an interesting view point on why criticisms of human rights may be increasing. LateFatherKarma (talk) 15:09, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Definition is wrong

[edit]

The introductory sentence is wrong in stating that human rights are 'universally' recognised. In fact, very few human rights are universally recognised. For example, the sanctity of human life is not recognised by countries practicing the death penalty. The equality of women (with men) and homosexuals are also not universally recognised. Definitions proposed by the United Nations and other such groups are politicised and also not universally recognised definitions.

I suggest the following changes to the introductory sentence:

Human rights are moral principles or norms that establish standards of human behaviour and are often protected by law. ~2026-40148-63 (talk) 22:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply