Talk:Hubert Alyea/GA1

Failed "good article" nomination

Upon its review on February 3, 2013, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:

had a virtual or complete lack of reliable sources

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to WP:Verifiability, "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source." This article is largely unsourced and far from attaining a good article status.

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.— JayJay^{What did I do?} 19:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)