Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a35b7c5bb3aea1

Jump to content

Talk:Hotel Otava

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Cassianto in topic Infobox

Infobox

[edit]

Ok, well seeing as the IP can't be bothered to log in, I'll start this, even though per WP:BRD the onus is not on me to do so. Joe K was Bold by adding the infobox; I Reverted, now they, or whoever, should Discuss. It's simple really. Oh, and while we, or I, it seems, discusses it, the article remains at the last stable version which was without the box. CassiantoTalk 20:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi? I am ready for discussion.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.254.222.97 (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Reply
There's nothing really to discuss, other than your disruptive behaviour that you seem to be exhibiting. When you can grow up, we can talk. CassiantoTalk 20:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ok, talk about what? I would like to keep the box, and I am not sure why you are trying to remove it. I have tried to compromise, per the article you reference. Is that satisfactory as it is now shorter. 150.254.222.97 (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Why don't you try and expand the article rather than expand the infobox? We are not catering for idiots. CassiantoTalk 20:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
I don't think the box is necessary yet. Maybe when the article's longer and more in-depth. For example, Enemies of the People doesn't have an infobox, whereas Hyde Park, London does. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Agree. I'm not opposed to a box eventually, but now is not the right time. Like I say, IP, create an account, write and source some content, and then add the box. CassiantoTalk 20:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ok, once I have expanded the article, I can then add the box. Thanks. 150.254.222.97 (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have followed your steps and added some content. I have added a half-box as a compromise, although I think the expanded article is now long enough that the full box doesn't look silly either. Tadeusz.1967 (talk) 21:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

You are socking. The box still looks ridiculous so I've removed it again. Can I ask why it means so much for you to have this infobox in place? CassiantoTalk 07:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply