Talk:Gregory Falco

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Johns Hopkins University Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Johns Hopkins University WikiProject. Learn more about this collaborative project here.Johns Hopkins UniversityWikipedia:GLAM/Johns Hopkins UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Johns Hopkins UniversityJohns Hopkins University-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Computer security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:

How you can help:

Add to your watchlist the project talk page! Post there for help with articles or to suggest articles that need work.
Request editing suggestions on your talk page by entering WikiProject_Computer_security into this template.
Check the article alerts to participate in deletion discussions, review Good Article nominees, and review draft articles.
Edit any articles that interest you. Recommended:
- Most popular articles that need the most work (last refreshed 1 August 2026)
- Popular articles (monthly top articles by views)
- High-importance stub-quality articles
- High-importance start-quality articles
- Mid-importance stub-quality articles
- Mid-importance start-quality articles
- Unknown-importance stub-quality articles
- Unknown-importance start-quality articles
Review changes to popular articles or changes to talk pages.
Replace deprecated archival service links.
Recategorize articles in Category:Security to more specific categories
Fix something on the list of articles that need cleanup, including:
- Clarification needed
- Rewrite needed
- Expansion needed
- Style editing needed
- Update needed
- Orphaned (add links from other articles to these articles)
- Conflict of interest
- Original research
- Promotional tone
- Biographies of living persons (BLP) articles lacking sources
- Cites no sources
- Cites unreliable sources

Of the 3624 articles in this project 1993 or 55% are marked for cleanup, with 4041 issues in total.

Editing resources:

COI editing templates

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(cc @C.Fred @Mocktrials) I initially reverted, but after having a second look through the edits done by Mocktrials, the issue seemed to have been fixed, so I rolled back by revert to the state that Mocktrials had left the article in. This was then reverted by C.Fred, was that an accident? I think that revert indirectly reverted Mocktrial's edits. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 03:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@TheManInTheBlackHat Thank you for clarifying that you looked through the article. I saw it go back to prior state while reviewing recent changes and rolled back, not realizing you'd had an "on second thought" moment. I've also self-reverted. —C.Fred (talk) 03:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

new category for commentary

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

perhaps create a new category for commentary? Cyber2go (talk) 04:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

COI editing templates

new category for commentary