Talk:Glitch Productions

What was "the gaslight district" article deleted

Why is the article for the gaslight district deleted? Uxfifig (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

It wasn't deleted, it was moved to a draft at Draft:The Gaslight District. It's because there are way too many primary sources in the article and not enough reliable ones. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 21:42, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Will it be coming back? 149.115.66.106 (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

If someone adds enough Wikipedia:Reliable sources to the draft, there's a good chance it will become a proper article. Go ahead, improve the draft! But please make sure the sources meet the requirements of Wikipedia:Reliable sources, e.g. they're independent of the subject of the article. — Chrisahn (talk) 02:21, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

May I also suggest giving Michael Kovach a page? 149.115.66.106 (talk) 19:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

I don't think many reliable sources mentioning Kovach exist, so that seems unlikely. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 22:19, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Didn't you do that for Will Wood? 149.115.66.106 (talk) 00:10, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

...no? Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 12:52, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

doesn't Michael kovach have a page? REAL Mr. CRT (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

He does now. This discussion is almost a year old and ended months ago. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 21:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

@SleepyRedHair bruh who tf would put so many primary sources in an article Uxfifig (talk) 23:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

I've been wondering the same thing. It seems very common though; we've had articles on Liam Vickers, Sunset Paradise, and Hobo Bros. been created with mostly (if not, only) primary sources. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 11:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

@SleepyRedHair That just sucks. Those 3 better come back AND NOT WITH PRIMARY SOURCES. Those are so annoying and it sucks to see the articles turn into drafts. Uxfifig (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

SMG4 Over?

Should someone add a date, since its announced, it’s over? – KaijuEditor (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

I don't think we'll be adding that until December 27, 2025. (Or 27 December 2025 in DMY.) Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 23:09, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Update: SMG4 has officially ended.

2 hours ago, the final episode, SMG4: THE END has released shane (talk to me if you want!) 19:41, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

We should add in smg4 and it’s spin-offs and the gaslight district again.

Like since the show is over and it got spin-offs we should at least add it as glitch’s first show. Alongside with the spin-offs like Sunset Paradise. Now re adding gaslight district again since it got green lit.@ ~2026-37134-7 (talk) 22:18, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Current TADC theater screenings for the last episode

I, personally, haven't checked many sources for this claim aside from posts on X/Twitter, but Glitch is currently planning on screening episodes 8+9 of The Amazing Digital Circus in theaters in America + some other countries and asking fans to submit requests to local theaters for worldwide screenings. This move made by Glitch is also extremely controversial and disliked by many fans, especially with the fact that the screenings are happening 2 weeks before the episodes actually release on YouTube. If there are proper sources, shouldn't this be written down in this article? Arguably in the "controversies" section too? KaprixKapri (talk) 22:35, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Unless there are there are reliable secondary sources that are both covering it, and framing it in terms of controversy, then it shouldn't be included in the article. To quote/paraphrase from WP:CRIT: any controversies/controversial material in an article must be "supported by reliable sources", and "[t]he prominence and proportion of coverage on negative or positive materials should reflect those of what is published in reliable sources. Prominence among Wikipedia editors or the general public are irrelevant", in order to comply with Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy. — Jamie Eilat (talk) 20:52, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

tadc end date

I do believe that they announced the episode nine release date for the amazing digital circus at the end of episode eight, but I might be wrong. REAL Mr. CRT (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Really unsure why you're posting this here? The Amazing Digital Circus article has already been updated. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 21:29, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

2026 Glitch event controversy

I don't know if you all heard about this, but a YouTuber named Plainrock124 was in a Glitch event when he stood next to a Jax cardboard cutout and says "Yo what's up nega, what's up nega!". Glitch later responded in X that he was permanently banned from future Glitch events. Hiyesnowbye (talk) 19:49, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

(I've previously given this near-exact reply in response to a different topic discussion on this talk page, but it equally applies here, so I'll simply restate it.) Unless there are reliable secondary sources that are covering it as a controversy, then it shouldn't be included in the article. Per WP:CRIT, any controversies/controversial material in an article must be "supported by reliable sources", and "[t]he prominence and proportion of coverage on negative or positive materials should reflect those of what is published in reliable sources. Prominence among Wikipedia editors or the general public are irrelevant", in order to comply with Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy. Jamie Eilat (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

TADC 9

So at the end of The Amazing Digital Circus episode 8, the release date for the last episode was revealed. Yet on the article, it still says “TBA”. Should someone change this? Just asking first, so I don’t get in trouble if there is a “not released, not real” rule I don’t know about… someone answer please! Ben Avital (talk) 13:39, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia guidelines, the release date will be added when it is released. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 13:57, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

GLITCH Productions

Listen up, Glitch Productions is NOT adult animation studio. Glitch themselves said that their ultimate goal is create animate shows for TEENAGE audiences (proof). And now, remove this category from their page, now. ~2026-32751-61 (talk) 10:24, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Oh great, you again. If this is the same person as the last times, 1) hopping between temporary accounts is against Wikipedia policies (see WP:SOCK) and 2) you've been explained to why their series are classified as adult enough times to the point where we shouldn't have to keep telling you. Not to mention, you keep giving the same explanation over and over despite the amount of other editors who have told you why it doesn't work like that. I see no reason to continue this discussion any further. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 10:32, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

How many times do I have to keep proving this and debunking your claims? They themselves said that they create animation for teenagers to fill the gap between children's cartoons and adult animated series. Here is all the reliable evidences (Interview and this).

I’ll repeat it again: Glitch makes animation for a teenage audience, not for adults. Adults are NOT their target audience. This applies to all of their shows (Murder Drones, The Amazing Digital Circus, The Gaslight District, Knights of Guinevere and Gameoverse).

Wikipedia is full of misinformation. Stop lying already. ~2026-33482-27 (talk) 11:11, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

See the other reply below. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 17:20, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

It's animation for a more mature audience. We can't just take their word on things, otherwise Wikipedia would be rife with false information. Just because Idi Amin said he was the King of Scotland doesn't mean he actually was. GarethBaloney (talk) 16:55, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Murder Drones is made for teens. This show is not made for mature audiences, stop speading misinformation. ~2026-36375-94 (talk) 12:15, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

I've removed the "adult animation studios" category because it was not verified in the article. You could have mentioned that and specified you're referring to the category, and yet you chose to repeat the same statement that's already been said and disproved several times. Just saying. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 13:01, 23 June 2026 (UTC)