Talk:Gimpel Fils

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsVisual arts

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article is still full of weasel words; "cutting edge approach in supporting innovative upcoming young artists" without citations, "its continuing commitment to contemporary art and support for fresh talent is still evident today" is also purple prose. In fact looking at the diff from the original time it was tagged and your claim of removing purple prose you removed nothing at all. If you're going to be prosaic you need to prove it from independent sources. The list of artists borders on WP:DIRECTORY as well in my opinion. --Blowdart | ^talk 16:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

{{advert}}