Talk:Gaw Capital

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (65)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (75)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (77) • B-Class articles (367)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,408)

Image needed (357)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (6,693) • Stub-Class articles (7,130)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (179) • ...assess the un-Importance (2,194)

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Private Equity

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This project seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:

Private EquityWikipedia:WikiProject Private EquityTemplate:WikiProject Private EquityPrivate Equity

Proposal to Remove the "Controversies" Section

Latest comment: 11 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I would like to propose the removal of the "Controversies" section from the Wikipedia page. To fairly reflect the company's profile, the relevance of controversies can vary, and generally, events older than 3 to 5 years may be considered less significant, especially if there have been no notable developments. Additionally, the term "controversies" can carry a negative connotation, which may not accurately represent the company's current standing.

Could you please let me know if there are any objections to this removal?

Thank you! 218.255.105.130 (talk) 02:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

No objections. Major international rating agencies typically consider a two-year media watch, so I support the removal of the 'Controversies' section. 218.255.105.130 (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Editors cannot agree with themselves! I strongly object. Edwardx (talk) 10:40, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Proposal to Remove the "Controversies" Section