Talk:Fujuriphyes dagon

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Dclemens1971 talk 22:39, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

• Fujuriphyes dagon
• Fujuriphyes hydra
• Fissuroderes cthulhu

)

Fujuriphyes hydra female mud dragon

• ... that Cthulhu, Dagon, and Hydra are actually mud dragons living off the coast of Madagascar?

• Source: Cepeda et al 2020 For the species names Cthulhu, Dagon, and Hydra. Cepeda et al 2020 & 2022 for "mud dragon" and for the type localities off the coast of Madagascar in the Mozambique strait.

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cynodon gibbus
  • Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Opifex fuscus and Template:Did you know nominations/Mecodema howittii

Nominated for the Halloween Sets

Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Number of QPQs required: 3. Nominator has 379 past nominations.

Kevmin § 16:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC).

• Starting review. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC) All 3 sources check out in WP:EARWIG. I've also spot-checked the following cited sources and found no issues:. In Fujuriphyes_hydra#Description, the first paragraph needs at least one citation (I assume it's the source cited in the next paragraph?). All three articles were recently moved to mainspace and are long enough for DYK. Of the three articles all have "mud dragon" and "Madagascar" in the lead, but only Fujuriphyes hydra has it cited in the body text to meet WP:DYKHOOKCITE. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  All 3 QPQs check out and 3 is the correct number for the multi-hook. The attention to detail in the beetle review is excellent. I would support running this on Halloween. The hook meets WP:DYKINT. Sometimes hooks that have more playful wording receive pushback or outright rejection at WT:DYK and WP:ERRORS, so I would suggest also including a more literal hook as a fallback, but this is not required for approval. Nice work, Kevmin. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 18:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Rjjiii Kevmin Please give this a tick if it's approved. Also, please voice your opinion about this in the Halloween set. Earth605^talk 18:53, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Earth605 There are 2 minor issues with citations above. Both are marked with {{DYK?}} question mark icons. Once that's resolved, I'll approve the nom by removing them and adding a tick to my final comment here. If I forget to comment about the Halloween set at WT:DYK, you are welcome to {{ping}} me. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 18:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Alt1... that the Mozambique strait mud dragons F. cthulhu, F. dagon, and F. hydra (pictured) were all named in honor of Lovecraftian beings?

@Rjjiii:Here's a more prosaic alt if errors has issues with the Halloween wording. I've added the needed additional citation on F. hydra, and added in-line use of the vernacular "mud dragon" to F. cthulhu and F. dagon with Cepeda 2022 as reference.--Kevmin § 15:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

This is good to go. All 3 articles meet the DYK guidelines and both hooks check out. I imagine that for Halloween the preference will be for the original hook. Thanks for doing the prosaic hook as a fallback, Kevmin. Also, this set of articles should work well in a Halloween set. I'll post to WT:DYK regarding that next. 20:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)