Talk:Frilled lizard/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 17:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• I've done a copyedit, feel free to point out any changes you disagree with.
• The conservation information is crammed into a single sentence in distribution; this should be expanded into its own section, especially since the IUCN mentions a lot about the effect of the pet trade on the species.

Will get to. LittleJerry (talk) 19:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

LittleJerry, any update? AryKun (talk) 13:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll get to this this weekend. LittleJerry (talk) 13:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

AryKun, done. LittleJerry (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

• I've done another copyedit, mostly fixing typos and italics.
• The cladogram doesn't mentions the scientific name of the species or the clade that it is representing; it's of limited use without this information.
• "may weigh" → "weighs"
• "may have black belly" → Is the color of the belly variable? If not, it should be just "males have a black belly"
• "that may merge" → See above.
• "Males may move around more" → "Males move around more" since you give statistics that suggest that males move around more
• "Male lizards may assert their boundaries" → See above, presumably a frill display is the most common way of asserting territoriality.
• Ref numbers refer to this version. Refs checked according to ref number generated by random number generator
• Ref 12 : Verifies all claims made.
• Ref 2 : Verifies all claims made
• Ref 10 : Verifies cladogram
• Ref 38 : Verifies all claims made.
• Ref 30 : Verifies all claims made.
• Rest of references are properly formatted and are to reliable sources, and seem to be properly used.
• Article is well illustrated and uses properly licensed images.
• Earwig is clear. AryKun (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Fixed all. I can't get for context for the cladogram since it would increase vastly in size. See this LittleJerry (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)