Talk:Flying Spaghetti Monster
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flying Spaghetti Monster article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Flying Spaghetti Monster has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination.
Discussions
|
Frequently asked questions
Flying Spaghetti Monster FAQ Q1: Why is this described as a parody religion? Who determines whether or not a religion is a parody?
A1: Reliable sources. There is unanimity among reliable, third-party sources that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is a satire. Moreover, founder Bobby Henderson is implied to have said it was in an interview with USA Today. "I don't know if (the FSM parody) makes a difference," Henderson says. "People who really need to get it aren't probably listening. But if anything, it might bring some awareness to undecided people out there." In any case, Wikipedia's standard for inclusion is verifiability, not truth. The bottom line is that we report what reliable sources have said. Q2: This offends me, a true Pastafarian, or could offend others. Should Wikipedia really be deliberately offending others?
A2: Putting aside whether a "true Pastafarian" exists, Wikipedia is not censored for one group or another, even if that means offending some people. Q3: Why does such an "insignificant" topic deserve such a long article?
A3: Simply put, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is notable. It has been mentioned in detail by news sources throughout the world. In the US, the New York Times, USA Today, Washington Post and many others wrote about it. In the UK, The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph, BBC and others wrote about it. In Germany, Der Spiegel wrote about it. In Canada, the Toronto Star wrote about it. In Australia, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation wrote about it. Even the Council of Europe mentioned the Flying Spaghetti Monster in a report about Creationism in science standards, and this is not to mention its ubiquity among online technology sites and notable blogs. Like it or not, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is famous. A comprehensive presentation requires a certain length. |
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
"VIRGIN MARINARA" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect VIRGIN MARINARA has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 3 § VIRGIN MARINARA until a consensus is reached. Ham II (talk) 19:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
???
[edit]What is this religion bro ~2026-43770-07 (talk) 01:50, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- It explains it in the first, introductory paragraph. Viriditas (talk) 01:57, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- I forgot this website was nothing like youtube ~2026-43770-07 (talk) 18:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Request to revise categorical “parodic” wording in the lead
[edit]| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |
|
I am requesting reconsideration of the article’s categorical description of Pastafarianism as a “parodic new religious movement.” That wording presents disputed characterizations as objective facts. Some media outlets, commentators, and secondary sources characterize Pastafarianism as parody or satire and associate its modern public emergence with Bobby Henderson’s 2005 writings. However, the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster rejects the characterization that Pastafarianism is merely parody or satire, and Pastafarian source material teaches that the religion predates its modern public emergence. The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster’s official About page states that it is “not a joke” and rejects the claim that the Church is simply satire. Independent legal scholarship published in the Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion also discusses sincere Pastafarian belief and quotes Bobby Henderson explaining that Pastafarianism is “not a joke.” Pastafarian churches, congregations, and organizations also exist in multiple countries, where adherents gather, organize, conduct religious activities, and sincerely practice Pastafarianism. The existence of practicing religious communities further complicates a categorical description of the entire religion as parody. Sources: https://www.spaghettimonster.org/about/ https://march.rutgers.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2022/09/Dowdy.pdf I suggest revising the lead so that these characterizations are attributed rather than presented as an uncontested definition. For example: “The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the deity of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or Pastafarianism. The religion came to widespread public attention in 2005 through writings by Bobby Henderson. Some media outlets and commentators characterize Pastafarianism as parody or satire, while the Church rejects that characterization and teaches that Pastafarianism predates its modern public emergence. Pastafarian communities and organizations exist internationally, and many adherents sincerely regard and practice Pastafarianism as a religion.” This wording preserves the documented modern history and the existence of published outside characterizations without presenting those characterizations as uncontested facts. Pasta Lore (talk) 05:53, 4 October 2026 (UTC) | |
- This is a perennial question on this talk page, so please see the FAQ near the top. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:04, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |
| |
- Not to mention indigestion. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:39, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Exactly.
- I find His Noodly Appendage difficult to digest, especially when He wiggles it around like He does sometimes. Maybe I should have chosen a religion with a less active communion wafer. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 02:15, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Not to mention indigestion. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:39, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- GA-Class Atheism articles
- Mid-importance Atheism articles
- GA-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- GA-Class Creationism articles
- Low-importance Creationism articles
- GA-Class Intelligent design articles
- Low-importance Intelligent design articles
- Intelligent design articles
- WikiProject Creationism articles
- GA-Class Skepticism articles
- High-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- GA-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Philosophy and religion good articles
- Old requests for peer review
