The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Want to add new information about FIFA? Please consider choosing the most appropriate article, for example:
FIFA was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: August 17, 2007.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Latest comment: 2 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Considering the corruption and well documented bloat where money spent to grow the sport is largely used to buy luxuries for certain members of FIFA and FIFA-affiliated organizations, I would like to see a section discussing the public criticism of the organization. People need to know that not all is right within the organization of self-anointed guardians of world soccer (association football). -- Srwalden (talk) 04:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi all - please do not start flaming, or arguing or edit warring.
I have just removed one of the notices, as I feel it itself is UNDUE. Plus, there is already an UNDUE notice at the top of the page.
"The last paragraph on the 2026 World Cup incident makes up 5% of the whole article - this could be condensed or split out to separate article"
The first part of that would be undue weight if it were not supported by thousands of refs, and the controversies were not more than 5% of FIFA going on. I suspect it is about right.
The second part should have been on the talk page, for discussion. If someone is going to insist on putting another notice back on, make sure that is not included. It is basically advertising an opinion.
Whomever put the note there also said "discussion on the talk page" but they did not start one, and there is not one. Well, there is now I guess. Chaosdruid (talk) 16:50, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The notice were added on 7/7 by Alcaios, diffs here and here. I agree that the "undue" tags are unnecessary and have removed the other one. If the argument is that the content should be split out then {{split}} would be more appropriate than {{undue}}, and would require talk page participation from the proposer. BugGhost🦗👻23:43, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Given the sheer content of FIFA corruption, the topic warrants its own article. The 2015 case rightfully has its own article because of its extent. This article can also include FIFA controversies. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 00:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm almost certain one could easily summarize FIFA corruption neatly in the existing section. This organization is constantly in the news and corruption is a lightning-rod issue for all football fans. If readers cannot find accessible content regarding the topic on this article, another article is unlikely to help. Peripteros (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
The redirect FIFA's has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 6 § FIFA's until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 07:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
