Talk:Euroscepticism
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Euroscepticism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Doubled language?
[edit source]The reasoning section seems to repeat what is said earlier in the introduction. One of them should either be expanded or deleted. Just checking if there's consensus for this. ForTheGrammar "Police" James (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
The part about euroscepticism in the UK reads pretty biased
[edit source]Specifically the part about cameron's Eu referendum policy.
No sources are listed and it reads like something from RationalWiki (which does not try to be as neutral and unbiased as possible as wikipedia Tamblingb (talk) 23:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Further reading
[edit source]Does the entry need a further reading entry. Currently there are two “References” sections but only three citations in the latter? She'll need more tests. (talk) 00:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
"Reasoning" section needs expansion
[edit source]We need more on the arguments of eurosceptics beyond a brief bullet-point list. Eldomtom2 (talk) 19:12, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Widening the definition of eurosceptism
[edit source]Per WP:Bold, revert, discuss, I reverted a substantial edit by Asminini because it introduces a concept to Eurosceptism that is broader than I have seen anywhere else and which reads to me as WP:SYNTH. It is certainly true that the Trump and Netanyahu régimes are hostile to the EU because they would rather see a divided and thus weaker Europe.
Whatever the rights or wrongs of those attitudes, external hostility to the European project is not Euroscepticism as it is commonly understood to date, so new RSs need to be introduced if it is to be broadened to include it.
Either way, prior discussion is needed. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:16, 16 May 2026 (UTC)