Talk:Emily Manning/GA1
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 months ago by MSincccc in topic GA review
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: MCE89 (talk · contribs) 13:29, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 15:51, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Source-to-text spot check
[edit]- 1 –
Done The fact that her father was a lawyer and politician is noted here.
- Also, could it be noted that Blandville and Henley are the same?
- Is there any way to access the rest of the sources? MSincccc (talk) 11:28, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thoughts, @MCE89? Thanks. MSincccc (talk) 10:50, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks @MSincccc, and apologies for the delayed reply! I've added that source for her father's occupation, and trimmed out the suburb of her death. You can access the Smith 2001 source here, and I can send a PDF of Hansord 2021 if you'd like to send me an email. I can also give quotes from Webby 1988 or send pictures of any pages you'd like to check. MCE89 (talk) 04:17, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thoughts, @MCE89? Thanks. MSincccc (talk) 10:50, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- 3-
Done - 6-
Done - 11-
Done - 16-
Done
Prose
[edit]- Life
- "At around nineteen" → "At about nineteen"
- "began to contribute her writing to periodicals" → "began contributing to periodicals"
- "published her writing in" → "published in"
- "was also briefly employed by" → "was briefly employed by"
- "Between 1888 and 1889" → "From 1888 to 1889"
- We could link to book review.
- Poetry
- We could link to secularisation and critical rationalism
- "describes Manning's poetry as featuring" → "describes Manning's poetry as characterised by"
- "She suggests that Manning's poetry displayed" → "She suggests that it displays"
- "Manning's poetry is distinguished by its" → "Her poetry is distinguished by its"
- "The opening poem of the collection" → "The collection's opening poem"
- "helps him to reach acceptance" → "helps him reach acceptance"
- "Manning's most significant work was the 1877 volume" → "Manning's most significant work is the 1877 volume"
- Bottom line
- MCE89 That's all for the prose. I intend to wrap up the spot check by tomorrow. Best, MSincccc (talk) 15:11, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks again, I've made all of the suggested prose changes . MCE89 (talk) 05:51, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.