Talk:Emaciation
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-44228-36 in topic generally unreliable sources?
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Emaciation.
|
A fact from Emaciation appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2012. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
i can't even begin to address all the things wrong with this article. someone please fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.121.22 (talk) 12:19, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes please 24.144.201.13 (talk) 01:15, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
generally unreliable sources?
[edit]I am unsure as to which sources this article deems to be generally unreliable; but have made an edit in good faith to broaden the context of this topic.
Moderators please advise so more reputable sources can be added.
Thank you. ~2026-44228-36 (talk) 11:32, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
