This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Hello and thanks for the input. Unfortunately, AI detectors are unreliable, especially for neutral, encyclopedic writing with a predictable structure and standard expressions. This is probably compounded by the fact that Wikipedia is a major part of AI training sets, similar to how other widely circulated texts, such as the US Constitution from 1787, show up as AI generated. Phlsph7 (talk) 18:02, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm not just saying this because of the detector; the text has inconsistencies, feels artificial in several sentences, and that could indicate the use of artificial intelligence to write it. You can't rely on that tool to write or improve articles because it has a significant tendency to generate falsehoods or inaccuracies, even when told not to. ~2026-47300-85 (talk) 07:15, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
