Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2571588c84a24d3

Jump to content

Talk:Dragonet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by VAleles in topic Suggested Edits

range

[edit]

Does "western Indo-Pacific" mean the Indian Ocean, or what? 162.119.64.112 23:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

General Comments

[edit]

1) Reproduction section
→The section contains different elements of reproduction/mating, and it definitely can be divided in to subsections (courtship, spawning, etc.)
→Part about sexual dimorphism should be located in a different section, or be placed properly in within the other text in the Reproduction section in order to fit appropriately.

2) Citing problems
→Citation needs to be made after each sentence in which claims are made, not all at the end of the paragraph

3) Clarifications
→Reproduction: "Both male and female dragonets have been observed in displaying..." Displaying what?
→Reproduction: What exactly is a water column?
→Reproduction: What do you mean by "one reproductive day"?

Jyn0309 (talk) 04:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Suggested edits

[edit]

General edits:

  • Hyperlinks are needed
  • The organization of sections is lacking
  • Paragraphs get somewhat large; it would serve to cut them up
  • Citations should go at the end of specific sentences, not all at the end of a paragraph.

Specific edits:

  • Summary paragraph
  • Insufficient. Add information inline with what is in the article below it.
  • Description
  • Types of fins and whatnot really need to be defined or at least hyperlinked.
  • There is a dearth of citations. Fix that.
  • Reproduction
  • This section is too clumsy in structure. Cut it into 3-4 smaller paragraphs.
  • Citations should be strewn throughout the text at the end of relative sentences, not all clumped at the end.
  • Aggression
  • Fix the title
  • Consider expanding
  • Hyperlinks!
  • Fix citations
  • Feeding
  • Hyperlinks!
  • Fix citations
  • Locomotion
  • Is this sections strictly necessary?
  • Hyperlinks!
  • Fix citations
  • Aquariums
  • The image screws up this section completely.

Bakerb4379 (talk) 00:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Suggested Edits

[edit]

Should have some information on what kind of habitats they prefer

Reproduction: uses some terms that aren’t defined (water column), maybe should consider defining it or linking it to a page about water columns if there is one

Reproduction: what does “one productive day” mean?

Reproduction section seems to run on, maybe consider making it more concise or splitting it up into three or so paragraphs

All sections: shouldn’t have all the citations at the end of the paragraph, they should be at the end of each sentence to which they correspond  Preceding unsigned comment added by Gopara (talkcontribs) 04:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Great job!! To raise to a Good article status, I recommend:

  • Add "Distribution and habitat" section. It will be better if you can add a picture showing their distribution.
  • Add "Taxonomy" section.

Hami910311 (talk) 20:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.110.213 (talk) Reply

General Comments

[edit]

Very good article! Contains lots of descriptive information but here are a few suggestions to help

  • Physical Description: Second paragraph of this section has no references for all the information presented there
  • Reproduction: Some of the information presented here are a little bit too in-depth, especially the numerical values. Maybe shorten it a bit and reduce unnecessary information
  • Feeding: Likewise, some information such as expelling food after eating are a bit too in depth or unrelated to the topic at hand
  • The later sections could maybe be combined with former sections, or expanded upon
  • Locomotion: This section seems unnecessary and too detailed for wikipedia
  • Defense: perhaps move this section up to the competition/aggression section? It could fit pretty well in there
  • In the aquarium section, the picture seems unnecessary and throws off the flow of the article. Perhaps removing it might be best

MLiu19 (talk) 21:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.102.204 (talk) Reply

Suggested Edits

[edit]
  • Try to add more sections/information to give a more comprehensive view of the fish.
  • Try to add more images.
  • Defense section is a little short. Try to incorporate elsewhere or include more information.
  • If possible, try to break up the Reproduction section. It's a lot of text.

VAleles (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply