Talk:Dolhir Formation

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dolhir Formation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140731140924/http://fossilworks.org/ to http://www.fossilworks.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Possible duplication

I have found the article Dol Formation, which may be a duplicate over this article. I had a look at the edit history of both articles and they appear to have been created at the same time. Also, from a brief google search I couldn't find a source which referenced both. However, I don't know much at all about geology so I could be wrong. Any help would be appreciated Freddieh9 (talk) 21:52, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

The definitive/official list of geological formations in Wales (The BGS Lexicon of Named Rock Units https://webapps.bgs.ac.uk/lexicon/) lists the Dolhir Formation but has no mention of a "Dol Formation". The cited source for the "Dol Formation" is fossilworks.org. My computer lists this as an insecure website so I'll not be checking it. I could find no other sources. I recommend that the "Dol Formation" article should be deleted. GeoWriter (talk) 15:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. I have now proposed it for deletion. Freddieh9 (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2026 (UTC)