Talk:Deeper Understanding
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Joejjc in topic Gaffa
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deeper Understanding article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
![WikiProject icon](/location/wiki/File:WikiProject_Songs_7"_record_on_sheet_music.png){kind=small}
Gaffa
[edit]Is Gaffa.org a reliable source? It seems to be a self published fan web site. --BwB (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- It really is. Gaffa.org functions as a Wikipedia of Kate Bush, a non-collaborative one, though; it is in the sense that it holds almost every piece of knowledge of Kate and her work. I hope this is a good reply. Nicoletis (talk) 02:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Not according to Wikipedia guidelines. Though well-intentioned, an open wiki or fan site doesn't cut it. Of the three links attributed to gaffaweb the first is to a copy of the lyrics; if the original album has the lyrics with the packagin, that would be the best place to cite. Sheet music would be another published source that's fair game.
- The second and thrid citation are actually the same (even the typos are reproduced) and are both a transcript of a BBC Radio 1 broadcast, which is actually the source that should be cited, although its much harder to verify than the incomplete transcript readily available on gaffaweb.JoeJJC (talk) 16:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC)