Talk:David Buchler
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Espresso Addict in topic Contested deletion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
[edit]Hello This page is not unambiguously promotional, because - it’s been up for 5 years or so and received independent contributions since being written - it is straightforward, factual information about a notable, well-known business person with a high profile over a long period, as evidenced by many years of referenced media coverage in leading publications - By no definition of the word promotional does it seek to invite any action on the part of the reader, highlight any present element of the person’s activities or attempt to interest the reader in a future event through a Wikipedia article.
I am surprised and curious why this has arisen now. Thank you for your consideration.
--Hydra2017 (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Hydra2017 and Justlettersandnumbers: I've declined the G11 speedy deletion; I agree the tone comes over as promotional, but I think at the least a discussion at AfD would be merited given the quality of some of the sources listed. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)