Talk:Dashavatara

Infobox image

Present image. Description: "Hindu god Vishnu (centre) surrounded by his ten major avatars (Krishna-Buddha version). Anticlockwise from top left: Matsya; Kurma; Varaha; ;Narasimha; Vamana; Parashurama; Rama; Krishna; Buddha and Kalki"

Proposal. Description: "Album of popular prints mounted on cloth pages. Colour lithograph, lettered, inscribed and numbered 38. The print is subdivided into ten equal parts, each representing one of the ten avatars, or incarnations, of Vishnu. Each image is identified with a Bengali inscription, and the avatars represented are: Matsya, Kurma, Varaha, Narasimha, Vamana, Parashurama, Rama, Krishna, Buddha and Kalki." 1895

Dear @Joshua Jonathan Can you plz change current image, this image is repeated in two articles, Avatar and Vaishnavism, why same img for different three article. This img is perfectly suited for Dashavatar, add this one. Naanu neenu (talk) 06:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

I understand your proposal, but personally, I wouldn't choose this one. Pale colours, and a lying picture, instead of standing. Maybe await some other responses? Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:43, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Balarama

The User Joshua Jonathan is consistently PoV pushing the Buddha version forward instead of presenting a neutral picture of the versions. He is also banning many from editing as seen from the log. The earliest depictions of avatars are on the coins of Diodotus. The said user keeps on promoting a 20th century painting instead. Uriiix (talk) 04:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm not promoting any version; I'm guarding to keep the overview of various versions complete, and counter the believers who are offended by the fact that the Buddha is regarded as an avatar of Vishnu by most traditions. If you don't like that, too bad for you, but you're wasting your time with pov-pushing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

ditto with you but you seem to promote the buddhist version. In India Buddha is NOT worshipped in any sect as an avatar. Prove this wrong using sources. Also Buddha's teachings are shunned as nastika leave alone being followed even by Vaishnavas

Someone posted Diodotus coins which are a legit ancient source. You pulled them to the gallery along with the Buddha version. Now you want only the Buddha version.

If there should be a rep. image it must be an antique one possibly. Uriiix (talk) 05:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Joshua Jonathan threatens and reverts. Not ready for a constructive talk on Agathocles coins Uriiix (talk) 07:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

And why should an ancient coin be the besg illustration? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

"If there should be a rep. image it must be an antique one possibly"

Says who? The Balarama-Buddha version is by far the most common in the present day Dāsānudāsa (talk) 08:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Bhuddha and Balaram are new

As a child I always knew Mohini as Vishnu’s avatar which is omitted here. That’s bad. Buddha was never in the picture. Infact he gave up Hinduism due to the social issues it created. Balrama was an avatar of Seshnag. Srk vijay (talk) 09:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

There was no "Hinduism" at 500 BCE. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 10:27, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

That's a deeply ignorant statement that Hinduism didn't exist at 500 BCE. Also, Mohini is not one of the main avatars, and many traditions of Hinduism believe that Sugata Gautama was the Buddha that's worshipped by Hindus, not Gautama Buddha. 2409:4089:8518:595E:0:0:26D5:B0AD (talk) 15:08, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Regarding That's a deeply ignorant statement that Hinduism didn't exist at 500 BCE - start reading some serious literature. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 18:11, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2025

Buddha is not one of the Avathar of Vishnu Venkateswara swami is. 93.40.70.54 (talk) 00:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Asteramellus (talk) 00:44, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2026

Remove Parashuram and Buddha and Balram as incarnation and from Dashavtar Wikipedia page they are separate of Dashavatar Parashuram is a Shiv Avatar and not Vishnu Avatar and Balram is his brother and not incarnation and Buddha is not his incarnation according to Hinduism it's in only Buddhist culture not for hindus Sarv2322 (talk) 09:46, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: What precisely is your request, and what WP:RS have you got? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 12:40, 6 June 2026 (UTC)